Mathew Polzin

That's an interesting idea. Have you seen OpenAPI tooling support this before? It seems to me it might need to be specifically supported per-extension if it was the assumed behavior...

I should clarify, in case your original question was about being able to put refs in extensions rather than being able to interpret extensions as refs: It is possible as...

@mihaelamj my thinking on whether a property like a map or array (that can naturally be empty) should be optional as well has thus far been whether there is a...

I do still want to explore using Property Wrappers or even Function Builders for this library. Function Builders especially could be cool, but they are only now gaining some of...

This is an annoying warning that showed up some time ago (via a new Swift version, I forget which one) and has changed a bit with each new Swift version...

Could you describe to me a bit more of what you would like to have be the result of include data being optional? Perhaps this is a hard question to...

I may see what I was misunderstanding -- you are probably saying the response payload does not have an `include` key in it at all, aren't you? whereas I was...

I just checked actually, and what I was picturing is still not a problem, so now I wonder if I could get to the bottom of this faster if you...

Thanks for the example. I think you are saying that decoding fails when `addresses`, `email_addresses`, etc. are commented out but succeeds when they are not commented out. If that's the...

It does clarify things, but it means that `Include5` and `Document` are not designed to do quite what you are hoping they will do. The `JSONAPI` library `Document` type always...