Matthias Bertschy comments

Results 349 comments of


                                            Matthias Bertschy

use application profile instead of sbomp

should not forget to update RBAC

fix the issue of losing the pending phase after a node restart.

> It's fine to wait until others have finished their reviews, but could you switch the order of the commits so that the E2E test addition comes first, followed by...

fix the issue of losing the pending phase after a node restart.

> @matthyx can you help review? I don't have much context into restartable init containers so I don't feel comfortable reviewing that part of the node. I can help with...

Update MITRE framework for new controls

@slashben this is for LFX :)

Allow Users to Limit Kubescape Worker Count (Concurrent Threads) to Reduce CPU/Memory Usage

@kerringtonwells do you think we could leverage GOMAXPROCS somehow?

Allow Users to Limit Kubescape Worker Count (Concurrent Threads) to Reduce CPU/Memory Usage

@kerringtonwells I've implemented your desired change here, do you have a way to try it out? I'm not sure it'll make a difference since in 2/3 cases it's overridden with...

Allow Users to Limit Kubescape Worker Count (Concurrent Threads) to Reduce CPU/Memory Usage

branch `pool` look at the linked PR https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape/pull/1804

Allow Users to Limit Kubescape Worker Count (Concurrent Threads) to Reduce CPU/Memory Usage

yes, so this is what I feared in https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape/issues/1793#issuecomment-2706922892 I'll try to rewrite this pool in the coming days and let you know...

Allow Users to Limit Kubescape Worker Count (Concurrent Threads) to Reduce CPU/Memory Usage

@dwertent any idea? I haven't found any goroutine spawning in the code, but still see the same behavior...

Exception when scanning local files

@QuinnBast can you provide some information on your repo, as I cannot reproduce locally