Matthew Elwell

> Do we want to make the new properties a part of the shared [evaluation context interface](https://github.com/Flagsmith/flagsmith/blob/main/sdk/evaluation-context.json)? > > CC @matthewelwell @kyle-ssg @khvn26 I'm not sure if these properties should...

Ok, sounds good. @khvn26 @tiagoapolo do you guys have an idea of the changes that are needed then?

Hi @Exnadella , thanks for submitting this and apologies for not getting back to you on it sooner. I have just merged a PR that re-enables the workflows for PRs...

Hi @tomerplus500 , thanks for the details here - we'll look at removing the UI section as you mentioned. To be clear here though, **there is no "Backdoor"** - the...

If you can provide reproduction steps, we can investigate but, as shown above, I have not been able to reproduce the issue.

`ALLOW_REGISTRATION_WITHOUT_INVITE: false`

If you want to prevent registration without invitation, this is sufficient. As per the discussion above, there is an improvement that we need to make in the UI to hide...

@asheeshChoudhary thanks for the details - it looks like there is a bug currently preventing using invite links when `ALLOW_REGISTRATION_WITHOUT_INVITE` is set to `false` - the frontend is not passing...

I have just retested this and can confirm that the behaviour works as expected.

Hey @jackforesightmobile , thanks for this. I have similar feedback on this one and the [one in the kotlin client](https://github.com/Flagsmith/flagsmith-kotlin-android-client/pull/51). I appreciate that we want to keep things consistent between...