Matt Garrish

Yes, the editor drafts for all the notes still have "epub" as the working group in the respec initialization metadata, but it's now "pm" (publishing maintenance working group). That's causing...

It seems to depend on the browser. When I tried it in Edge yesterday I was going to post the same comment about it being fine, but when I tried...

I'm going to close this issue as we fixed the problem when we republished all the notes in https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/pull/2599.

> Note that the preview shows a respec error The error says that the status section must contain at least one custom paragraph. When did that become a requirement and...

> I would expect the error will go away if that is put back... Ah, right, I was looking at a different version locally that still had the section. I...

> I am not familiar with history, so @mattgarrish @bduga should know better, but I _suspect_ that the goal was more on the informative side. I can't say I recall...

> What about adding more or less the same text as the one quoted for HTML to the security consideration section of the RS We switched everything in that section...

Looking at this again, I was thinking the original prose was requiring reading systems to verify the media type, but if all this is asking is that reading systems _set_...

> MUST ... in a manner consistent with ... Is there a way to make this more precise? "such that the result is consistent with"? There are (deliberately obtuse) ways...

> Do we really need to add anything, though? Given where we are in the revision, I'm fine if we want to defer the issue. Last minute additions have a...