Matt Caswell

Closing since this is marked as resolved.

CI issue is not relevant. Setting to "ready to merge"

Pushed to 3.1 and 3.0.

> Is there any interest on taking TLS_SM4_GCM_SM3 implementations into OpenSSL repo? It's not currently on our list of things for implementation, but I think we would definitely consider an...

Fixup pushed to address md-nits issues. @hlandau, @t8m please reconfirm.

>> This is an issue, not a pull request, there is nothing we can approve at this time. > > I do not think you should lie like that even...

> Should/Will it be the same as the EVP_AEAD API from BoringSSL? I don't know. Maybe (it would make a lot of sense) - but we would have to evaluate...

I think your SAN data is not in the correct format. RFC 5280 says that a SAN extension is a GeneralNames object (called GENERAL_NAMES in OpenSSL). In OpenSSL terms this...

Is it standardised? We only accept standardised crypto.

approval done added