Matt Caswell

> @mattcaswell Is it realistic to get this merged before 3.0 beta1? If not, should we lower the stress level and just wait for when the master is opened for...

> On the other hand the PR is now in final mergeable state (no conflicts, tests pass) of course pending further comments if there are any. But now with nothing...

This is currently blocked with an OMC hold. I will raise it at the next OMC meeting.

There was *extensive* discussion about these very points in the OMC meeting yesterday. The result was this ongoing vote: https://github.com/openssl/general-policies/issues/27 The argument in favour of doing this is that we...

> Although you're right that in most cases the version checks in the tests will have to be there anyway, my example with one version regression in a legacy or...

> This also doesnt need to be run very often I would imagine? Correct. The in-progress vote only talks about doing it on release. I suspect we may do it...

IMO this should not go into 3.0. Removing that beta 1 milestone.

OMC have voted to lift the OMC hold on this PR.

> Is there anything blocking this PR now when threads are in? It would be great to get this rebased so we can continue the review work. I'm not aware...

Note that the self tests are run during installation, but not each time that the module is loaded.