Mats Dufberg

That error could be captured, couldn't it? If so Zonemaster could have the logic to resend the query over TCP if the following requirements are fullfilled: * The query was...

I also wonder about the inconsistency between rfv.se and riksforsakringsverket.se...

> @matsduf Oddly enough, although the error is still present, I can't seem to be able to reproduce the behavior from Zonemaster: @tgreenx, I can also see that I do...

> The same problem occurred again recently. So 'latest' has been disabled again with #1062. What is the point in testing Zonemaster::Engine develop branch against Zonemaster::LDNS master branch? I am...

I am not against the change, but I think its value is marginal since the parameter is probably almost never changed. Unless there is another change that triggers a `V-Major`...

Another option would be to add `resolvers.defaults.tries` defined as `resolvers.defaults.retry` is defined today, and then deprecate `resolvers.defaults.retry` and remove it after a year or so when we have another breaking...

There could be DNSSEC related test cases that should be executed even if the zone is not signed. We have at least one such test case, i.e. the test case...

Independent how we do it, it must start with the specification. Today's situation where the implementation does not fully follow the specification is not good. If we have dependencies between...

Thank you for lifting this up. Today, the default value of EXTRA_NAME_CHILD is [NOTICE] whereas EXTRA_NAME_PARENT is [ERROR]. I would not expect an extra name sever to be a validation...

Original TTL of RRsig and the RRset it signs is part of the RRsig signature.