Mats Dufberg
Mats Dufberg
> * Before this PR CLI would call either `test_zone`, `test_module` or `test_method` in Zonemaster::Engine > to run the test. After this PR CLI always calls `test_zone` and uses the...
> All I'm hearing is "no" and "bad". Is there anything about this proposal that you do like? It would be good to be able to exclude test cases without...
We could prioritize other updates until the test case specification is updated. Issue for update: https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster/issues/1088
A specification is to written for this feature.
This should just be the output of the Engine as a message with DEBUG level, preferably each time a server is queried. It might be that we have to add...
First step is to see if Zonemaster can extract NSID through LDNS. If not make a request and possibly a PR to LDNS.
@gbicann, thank you for your proposal. We will review this. Making Zonemaster more flexible is positive. When you do some POC runs, do not forget to create a custom profile.json...
I can see how you have done it, but I cannot see how you envision `install_custom_test_module()` to be run. I could be run by a custom client, but not by...
I like the idea of making it possible to add a plugin with addition custom test cases to zonemaster, but I am also curious about you example of additional test...
> On reflection, I agree that perhaps it would be better to add custom modules using an option in the profile. Perhaps a `custom_modules` property, like this: > > ```json...