matrixone
matrixone copied to clipboard
[Discussion]: Should we support float(m, n) and double(m, n)?
Is there an existing issue for the same bug?
- [X] I have checked the existing issues.
Environment
- Version or commit-id (e.g. v0.1.0 or 8b23a93):
- Hardware parameters:
- OS type:
- Others:
Actual Behavior
mysql supported that, and we didn't.
And we can accept the sql like
create table t1 (a float(6, 2));
create table t2 (b double(20, 4));
we should just reject it at parser or support it really.
Expected Behavior
No response
Steps to Reproduce
No response
Additional information
No response
Has a conclusion that 0.5 doesn't support float/double with param of precision.
Discuss with @aressu1985, Cases will not modify and plan will not reject form of float/double with param. This issue can move into 0.6.
Hello @m-schen. The bug issue in the BVT test code has not been removed,issues automatically open.
it's just a discussion that time. I found that someone try to close it 16 hours age. can I think that we won't support this form of float / double ?
so I closed this issue.
Hello @m-schen. The bug issue in the BVT test code has not been removed,issues automatically open.
link: this Discussion does not work temporarily @m-schen @aressu1985 @fengttt