[Tech Request]: Reduce storage layout interference from wide-range objects

[aptend]

Is there an existing issue for the same tech request?

• [x] I have checked the existing issues.

Does this tech request not affect user experience?

• [x] This tech request doesn't affect user experience.

What would you like to be added ?

For the `statement_info` table, when both non-sys and sys tenants are active, it's common to have a large-range object that eventually triggers extensive rebalancing operations in level 7, involving a lot of IO

Why is this needed ?

No response

Additional information

No response