feat[bindings]: expose power level thresholds in corresponding timeline event

[JoFrost]

Hello! This PR exposes power-level thresholds in OtherState::RoomPowerLevels for the FFI timeline.

It includes action requirements such as ban, kick, invite, redact, state_default, events_default, per-event overrides and notifications. This gives FFI clients direct access to the effective power levels of a room, which were previously unavailable.

• [x] Public API changes documented in changelogs (optional)

Signed-off-by:

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 88.59%. Comparing base (cd9f433) to head (4c59282). :white_check_mark: All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5931      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.59%   88.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         364      364              
  Lines      104341   104341              
  Branches   104341   104341              
==========================================
- Hits        92438    92437       -1     
- Misses       7537     7539       +2     
+ Partials     4366     4365       -1     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq[bot]]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5931 will not alter performance

_{Comparing JoFrost:main (4c59282) with main (cd9f433)}

Summary

✅ 50 untouched

[JoFrost]

Hello @poljar! Quick check on this PR.

I wanted to confirm whether this aligns with the intended API direction, or if you’d prefer to wait for #5937 to be merged and then have this rebased on top of it. If this approach doesn’t hit the mark, I’m happy to close the PR.

Thanks.

[poljar]

I wanted to confirm whether this aligns with the intended API direction, or if you’d prefer to wait for #5937 to be merged and then have this rebased on top of it.

Yes, let's do that, I don't think there's much blocking #5937 so it should be merged soon™.

[JoFrost]

All done @poljar. I rebased on main, and used what was introduced in #5937 for this PR.