Matthias Prechtl

I'm working on this issue.

I have a few questions re: API in arch-rs and its interaction with radeco. 1. The [setters](https://github.com/radare/arch-rs/blob/master/src/regfile/regfile.rs#L74-L90) for BasicRegInfo take `&mut` to themself, yet a `RegisterFile` can only return [`&(BasicRegInfo...

Copying data into a newtype is also not a solution, since `RegisterFile` returns Option, making it not possible to return an ad-hoc created value. My preferred solution would be to...

Just a quick heads-up :) I'm trying to allocate a bit time between exams and work. These are bigger refactorings than anticipated and i'm still working through the software stack...

~Would it make sense to rename SubRegister-/File to RadecoRegister-/File or something similar? I've stumbled a few times upon SubRegister, thinking it would be some partial Register? Didn't make sense to...

Just to make sure i'm on track: 1. ~The SubRegister/SubRegisterFile are ~the implementations~ definitions for IR registers?~ (classic RTFM) 1.1 ~So this would enable users to use a library generic...

I can't find time to work on this. Feel free to give it to someone else / take it :)