analysis icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
analysis copied to clipboard

Mathematical Components compliant Analysis Library

Results 283 analysis issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

This PR is an application of s-finite kernels to probabilistic programs. (NB: an early version of this PR appeared as PR #749 which is scheduled for closing) It provides a...

experiment :test_tube:

(I am just posting for the record an installation failure that I ran into last night but can't investigate right now, hoping somebody as a quick clue.) This opam command...

"bug" :bug:
build/continuous integration :gear:

We've discussed at a handful of meetings that `topology.v` is too big at 8000 lines long. It causes at least 3 problems. 1. It makes it a pain to develop...

renaming/refactoring :wrench:

https://github.com/math-comp/analysis/blob/a5e2c659ea31a86b4789c9094f771d960187bf5c/theories/realfun.v#L14-L15 @CohenCyril I remember that you recently made a comment about this documentation being wrong but I cannot find your comment. What was it?

documentation :memo:

https://github.com/math-comp/analysis/blob/437d12c836f530fe5dfc8a26e7330b2653d175a3/classical/mathcomp_extra.v#L1491 "According to WP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotonic_function), this should rather be monotonic and I would expect it to be non strict (with homo instead of mono). Maybe we should also have a...

renaming/refactoring :wrench:

of `expRMm`? https://github.com/math-comp/analysis/blob/1d1d9bf2f8efb61ee33e73f3220d855ce7cce8e2/theories/exp.v#L410

question :question:

https://github.com/math-comp/analysis/blob/7622cc7f7392b8866d7900ffb6ab6b1e48e81a7f/theories/measure.v#L2514 Shouldn't this be `Content_SigmaSubAdditive_isMeasure` to match the name of the predicate `sigma_sub_additive`? Also, we have `sigma_sub_additive` and `sigma_subadditive`. What about using `sigma_subset_subadditive` for `sigma_sub_additive`? (Or maybe the intent of...

https://github.com/math-comp/analysis/blob/c518e2a302126cbc96a7527e28cac28aaf443822/theories/lebesgue_integral.v#L3420 i.e., `f \_ D` instead of `f \* \1_ D` ?

question :question:

##### Motivation for this change @t6s ##### Things done/to do - [ ] added corresponding entries in `CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md` - [ ] added corresponding documentation in the headers ##### Automatic note...

experiment :test_tube:

##### Motivation for this change tentative definition C1 ##### Things done/to do - [x] added corresponding entries in `CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md` - [x] added corresponding documentation in the headers ##### Compatibility with...

experiment :test_tube:
TODO: MC2 port