Mateusz Baran

Cool :+1: . RLM seems to need a somewhat different interface though.

> I revisited this and for the most general case (outside of RLM), I have no real idea how that could be done or what that would even mean for...

> Technically, the latter seems more consistent with other distributions... It can potentially be confusing if `std(d) != std(rand(d, N))`. > But are there actual scenarios when non-circular std/var of...

Thanks for working on this, I'd definitely like to be able to have bibliographies on for example Documenter web pages :slightly_smiling_face: . Have you seen libraries like https://github.com/brechtm/citeproc-py ? Maybe...

That's quite a lot of dependent packages. I could check if removing it breaks Plots.jl but going through all of these packages is a bit too much :sweat_smile: .

Good idea, although I'd prefer to do it in a few steps: 1) Moving connections to ManifoldsBase.jl. Connections are tightly integrated with both metric manifold and Lie groups and algebras....

Well, `AbstractConnectionManifold`s aren't necessarily Riemannian manifolds. And I've also noticed that it's not possible to tell which manifolds are Riemannian through abstract type hierarchy. So `AbstractRiemannianManifold` doesn't seem like a...

We already have CG and RKMK integrators sort of figured out here so I hope implementing a moderate-order symplectic method won't be too difficult.

Some references: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112517 and papers cited therein.

OK, sure, we can have a different logo for `ManifoldDiffEq.jl`.