Mateus Felipe C. C. Pinto

Ah, that makes sense. We could still promote, like ```dart class C { int? property; // ... void case1() { final property = this.property; if (property != null) { this.property...

Currently, `unawaited` is present in `pedantic` package. What is the advantage to have `unawaited` as a keyword instead of moving it from `pedantic` to Dart core? Obviously, practicality is one...

Thanks, this makes sense.

> You mean, it's easier to write > `model.scheduleNotifications(); // ignore: unawaited_futures` > than > `unawaited model.scheduleNotifications();` > ? > Currently, it's `unawaited(model.scheduleNotifications())`.

> I am surprised that no one has already asked for that (at least I did not find a relevant issue). There are at least two issues similar to this...

> Please, if possible, do not speculate on the internals, as it will need extra effort to dig it up and refute the claims. I'm sorry, I won't do it...

It is only harder to read as long as one doesn't know that it means. Even so, people can still often deduce what it means by context. I don't think...