Nico Matentzoglu
Nico Matentzoglu
Just to be clear, the proposal on rdfs:isDefinedBy stands as you suggest, this has nothing to do with it. The one is concerned with what is the terms' conceptual home...
> Also, your logic for finding this appropriate for axioms but not for classes ("terms") (meaning it could be appropriate for the axiom(s) defining a class but not for the...
It is, but one ontology O1 may import an old definition, one O2 a newer one. And you may import both of these (O1 and O2) into an ontology O3,...
I see where you are coming form, ok. Axioms in our world are _not_ eternal, they are constantly being revised, corrected constrained further, relaxed etc.. Same as textual definitions. I...
Thank you @jonquet Hard are the standardisation days. I have already tried to suggest your proposal and got strong resistance against it. I will try it again.
I only saw your second comment later after I sent my response. We need to distinguish between the copy paste practice which I live to ban from OBO, and the...
Interesting. I like this a lot! For the most seamless implementation of this, what do you propose? A big sparql query like: ``` SELECT ?s ?p ?o WHERE { ?s...
This is great, thank you all for the clarification :)
Thank you @gouttegd! Did announce it in slack.
> I would vote for mirroring the name of the robot option rather than changing slightly. i.e. reduce: named-classes-only 100% I agree; > Also nervous about just changing a default...