Nico Matentzoglu

@ignazio1977 thank you very very much for your super helpful analysis! This makes sense to me.. We will leave this ticket open and fix it when more pressure mounts -...

> The resulting ontology includes not only the annotated axioms but also the unannotated versions. So they are all duplicated. The unannotated axioms should be removed. I think we need...

Ah didnt think of that case where the same axioms comes from two sources.. Maybe. Ok. Yeah, in any case I agree that this is needed.

Its not entirely inconveivable to use ``` http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/{oid} ``` to redirect by default to, say, the PURL config which contains all the rules for the redirect..

hey @alanruttenberg For your point 2. have you tried `--labels true`? (https://robot.obolibrary.org/diff) Re 1. Would be super useful, I agree, but its not easy to implement. I think @jamesaoverton and...

I think the kgcl will cover these cases that you are talking about; I would wait for that. Inferring changes from additions and removals is a bit non-deterministic (see example...

May have to go to ROBOT as a ticket, but lets discuss at the next tech call.

@ubyndr assign to yourself once you have accepted ODK invite

We will move to KGCL later when it is ready - for now, @ubyndr is cooking up a robot diff process. Ideally we should be able to make the action...

Just as an aside - I would caution very very strongly against using owl:deprecated on axioms. I can see the appeal for provenance reasons, but the amount of confusion this...