Mat Balez

NACK (for the purposes of this content addition to the Guide) The Satoshi symbol is antithetical to the proposal in BIP177. The core idea in BIP177 is that it is...

I tend to agree that "bitcoin" is the cleaner usage and we should aim to consistently use the cleaner form. I reviewed the 51 mentions of "bitcoins" across 26 files...

I personally continue to prefer this BIP narrowly focusing on the issue of base unit naming and not opining on preference of "bitcoin" vs "bitcoins" or providing guidance on the...

I think there is agreement that this BIP need not state *guidance* on which style guide should be adopted by others (countable vs uncountable ), it should simply adopt one....

@BitcoinErrorLog asked for example usage of bitcoin as uncountable noun. Perhaps the popular dominant usage of bitcoin in uncountable form is the supply cap most commonly referred to as 21M...

Fun exploration, and cool use of AI to make the execution feasible. I really like this Christoph and think it's worth further exploration A few brainstorm-ey thoughts: - might be...

@GBKS it seems to me the proposed naming & architecture of this page makes sense: "Human Readable Addresses" is the generic/parent concept that is meaningful - "Human Bitcoin Address" is...

I agree with Matt that [Company name] bitcoin address is a recipe for confusion, as it will create an impression of many different types of addresses (in a situation of...

Email is not a good analogy because when email emerged there was not N competing address types that could receive email. It was a singular technology that gained widespread adoption...