Fix new svt-av1 versions 2.x.x being treated as old svt-av1

[damian101]

Invalid use of 1.. in a match function, as it has no upper bound. Replaced with a wildcard pattern to simply catch all remaining patterns, which I think should work fine here.

[shssoichiro]

This is a little confusing. Matches are supposed to be exhaustive, so 1.. should be catching everything 1 and greater. What bug is occurring here? This should be a compile-time error if the match is not exhaustive.

[trixoniisama]

#837

[shssoichiro]

I see, however, I don't understand why this fixes the issue. As I mentioned, 1.. and _ should be equivalent here. If they're not, then that's a very unexpected behavior because the compiler should be throwing errors if we currently have a non-exhaustive match statement.