Martin Liška

Can you please attach here all the mentioned RPM files (use `.tgz` extension) and I will take a look.

> make it hard to find the list of valid licenses that should be used. I propose a few solutions for this to see which you'd prefer: > > 1....

> Yea that helps, the `--explain` functionality I hadn't seen yet and that pretty much negates the first suggestion. Great! > For the second one I'm on track to get...

This seems to be a candidate for milestone `2.1`. I don't see it fundamental for `2.0` release.

@Vogtinator @DimStar77 Can you please help me if the `cross-directory-hard-link` is a correct rpmlint error reported?

> I don't think `/usr/bin` being split onto a different partition than `/usr/lib64` was ever considered a supported setup in any distro. So rpmlint seems to be slightly too eager...

Let's merge this once `rawhide` is operational again.

Note that rpmlint uses `SPDX License List` as defined here: https://spdx.org/licenses/. So my guess is that you need something like `GPL-2.0-with-autoconf-exception`, in your case `sip6`..

> Not for Fedora, it doesn't. It still uses the traditional RPM shorthand identifiers. What do you suggest for the mentioned license (`License: (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and (GPLv2+ with exceptions)`)...

Oh, you are right, I haven't noticed the split error messages.