Gabor Marton
Gabor Marton
> Maybe the problems only occur when the scope is explicitly written in source code (like at `X::A` and `Y::A` only `A` is checked). So the "written string" could be...
There is another case which we should keep in mind: ``` TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceFunctionTest, Maci) { auto t = makeNamedDecls( "class X; namespace A { using Y = X; } void foo(A::Y&);",...
This implies that first we have to implement the import of the redecl chains for all nodes. E.g. EnumDecl, VarTemplateDecl, and lot of other nodes still do not handle the...
Unfortunately this seems to introduce more structural eq errors. http://ci2.codechecker.gic.ericsson.se:8080/job/ctu_pipeline_clang7/44/
Perhaps it is better to put this on hold until we fix some other ODR issues.
Specializations have the concrete template parameter, so this is not a severe problem. (Until a checker is seeking an error based on default template parameters.)
Hey, thank you for the example. It's great that we could have a work around for this limitation. I'd like to keep C++11 compatibility, but we could detect if the...
Okay, thank you. I am extending the readme to advertise your fork for C++20.
Umm, not closing, since at some point we could backport to C++14.
Hey, thanks again. It'd be great to have a PR for this as well. We could define a macro if clang or gcc has the required language features (or we...