Martin Thomson

It should. Did it work for you? I do need to update docs though...

It looks like you got it working. (BTW, I generally mark .xml as .INTERMEDIATE explicitly. They aren't that useful and I generally don't find having them lying around to be...

My only suggestion would be to warn or generate an error if this happens.

Ugh, I keep forgetting that xml2rfc is similarly impeded. `-o` is a reasonable compromise. As for what you feed into xml2rfc, it appears that recent xml2rfc versions don't care what...

Sorry, the name of the output file is the only thing that xml2rfc uses the input name for. If you use `-o`, then the file name doesn't appear to matter.

I just did a little research and it seems like you don't need certified in ruby 2.6 or later. It's a little murky as things get older - the documentation...

I'm only using empirical evidence here: I tried it. It's quite possible that distros are doing good things with their openssl or ruby installations that lead to good outcomes. So...

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ruby_Programming/RubyGems#How_to_install_different_versions_of_gems_depending_on_which_version_of_ruby_the_installee_is_using is an interesting avenue to explore. Perhaps a little heavyweight though.

Proposed grammar: fold = none | end | both

@reschke, >> Proposed grammar: fold = none | end | both > > @martinthomson - what would these values mean? Am I missing something here? none = no folding end...