Martin Moene

Ah, thanks! I have no memory of having noted this special case. Will see to incorporating it, soon-ish. Added, note to self: - https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p0323r12.html#void - https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p0323r12.html#expected.object.eq

Add tests for operator==() with void 'value' type.

Note to self: > Separation of concerns may be improved upon, something I hope to look into later. Leaving this issue open, for now, for review.

Thank you for making me aware of this. Takes some staring at it...

Thanks for the heads-up. Had a brief look at it. It may not be a 'trivial' change, requiring a bit of probing how I'd like to approach this. May take...

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Will look into it, likely in the weekend.

Thanks for providing insight into this *back*ground :)

Thanks @Morwenn, for your interesting observation. I'll try and incorporate it.

Todo: - [x] add C++20 to GitHub Actions builds (msvc already includes c++latest). - [ ] make unique_resource constexpr.

@kevinefurd Your message would have been more helpful if it were specific.