Martin Moene

@oliverlee Thanks for your suggestions!

Thanks @Andoku , for spotting & reporting this. Added the missing test case and corrected the behaviour.

Ah thanks,will look at that too.

Thanks for your interest. Do you have suggestions to make it easier to start on it?

Okay, thanks nonetheless.

@flexferrum, just to let you know I've noticed your question, looking at it in sparsely scattered time ;)

Added branch [issue-8-abstract](https://github.com/martinmoene/value-ptr-lite/tree/issue-8-abstract). Not making any progress. After 30+ years there's a sense that C++ might perhaps not be for me ;) @flexferrum Do you have an idea how to...

Hi @Manu343726, I added a [conan recipe](https://github.com/martinmoene/value-ptr-lite/blob/master/conanfile.py) and published it at [ value-ptr-lite:nonstd-lite / 0.1.0:testing](https://bintray.com/martinmoene/nonstd-lite/value-ptr-lite%3Anonstd-lite/0.1.0%3Atesting). Is this approach ok and sufficient?

it's interesting :)

The same has already been taken care of in `nonstd::optional`, likely via [its issue 69](https://github.com/martinmoene/optional-lite/issues/69). See the expanded [Compiler Explorer snippet](https://godbolt.org/z/hzv66P5Tj). I'll update `nonst::expected` likewise.