Martina Morris

`summary_formula` already works for `networkDynamic`

@krivit, @chad-klumb i think this issue needs to be resolved before release. either these durational terms can be used in operators, or they can't (for now). the docs need to...

thanks for the detailed response @chad-klumb. i agree with you, and i think this is actually (another) paper. so, the question remains: 1. do we want to remove the ability...

How hard would it be to implement (1)?

What can't wait is the documentation. What do we want that to say? > thanks for the detailed response @chad-klumb. i agree with you, and i think this is actually...

> Agreed with @chad-klumb; in particular, we should warn the user not to nest temporal operators. By "nest temporal operators" are you referring to this: > `Form(~mean.age)`

So I'm going to say that *the use of durational terms during estimation is not currently supported* but they can be used as targets, monitors, etc.. Is that correct?

What's confusing me is that the stub currently says: ``` As currently implemented, the package does not support use of durational terms during estimation (i.e., in the formation or dissolution...

Ok, for now I'm going with this: ``` As currently implemented, the package does not support use of durational terms during estimation. But the durational terms may be used as...

If we can't say what they mean -- i.e., how to interpret the coefficients, I would say they are "unsupported". I'm imagining someone writing to `statnet_help` after fitting a model...