marshmallow-sqlalchemy

marshmallow-sqlalchemy copied to clipboard

Deserializing nested json

1

I have trouble setting up the Schemas to properly deserialize my sqlalchemy models: I have a simpl one to many relationship between study and redcap fields, I set up my...

CarolusMagnuss

marhsmallow auto generated field using `enum.Enum` raises error on load

2

Hi, When I define SQLAlchemy columns using `enum.Enum` the auto generated marshmallow field fails validation when I try to load: ```python import enum import marshmallow as ma import sqlalchemy as...

joaquimvl

Is there documentation for SQLAlchemySchema's or SQLAlchemyAutoSchema's `load` method?

1

I've looked at the documentation [here](https://marshmallow-sqlalchemy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api_reference.html#marshmallow_sqlalchemy.SQLAlchemySchemaOpts) and under `sqla_session` it says `You can also pass a session to the Schema’s load method.` However, it's unclear how to pass the session...

alichaudry

This look similar to #54. ```py class Model(Base): __tablename__ = "table" field = sqla.Column(sqla.Enum(MyEnum, name="my_enum")) class ModelSchema(AutoSchema): class Meta(AutoSchema.Meta): model = Model # Code works if this line is commented...

lafrech

This line shows that fields' `required` flag will only depend on whether they are nullable and have a default value: https://github.com/marshmallow-code/marshmallow-sqlalchemy/blob/3754933b49554e6b7aa0ce282b43befb730dd7b2/src/marshmallow_sqlalchemy/convert.py#L427 But we're running into cases where certain fields (eg...

zedrdave

Memory usage creep in >=1.4.0

12

After a fair amount of bissecting to pinpoint this issue, I wanted to surface the fact that our CI unit test suite fails consistently when using >=1.4.0 (in Apache Superset)....

mistercrunch

I suspect a breaking change related to "include_relationships=True" and schema.load() in version 1.4.1

5

Hi ! I recently had to do some testing on my local for some portion of our code that's been running happily on staging. I didn't specify a version number...

Curiouspaul1