Joshua Marner

@YkTru There are two issues here that seem to be complicating things. 1. Moving from Dynamic View Models to Static View Models. 2. Moving away from the premade helpers (for...

@xperiandri Do you think it would help the experience to change `Binding.SubModelT` etc to `BindingT.SubModel`? This might improve the auto-complete situation. I'm a bit unsure about committing to 3,500 lines...

I'm actually not very fond of the overload strategy that was used. It causes a bunch of confusion especially when you're passing in multiple selectors. > @marner2 Why are you...

@xperiandri the core dispatch loop of Elmish is single-threaded, so you would want to avoid generating messages in the first place that you don't want immediately applied to the model....

I see, it's definitely an oversight. Creating tests and updates now...

Should be fixed with [4.0.0-beta-56 on NuGet](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Elmish.WPF/4.0.0-beta-56) when that goes live.

@xperiandri Could you expand in more detail what exactly you want to get done? There are a lot of things this could mean. The main one is a XAML `{x:Static...

Ah, that looks like an oversight on my part when porting everything over. `Binding.oneWaySeq` under the hood returns an `ObservableCollection`. In this case, it gets boxed to an `obj` before...

@Sapein the correct way to handle this would be by composing `Binding.mapMsg` and `Binding.mapModel` after `Binding.SubModelWinT.id`. See the example with [`Binding.SubModelT.req`](https://github.com/elmish/Elmish.WPF/blob/master/src/Samples/SubModelStatic.Core/Program.fs#L128) which is essentially the same thing as a simple...

Please update PR #591 to include fantomas. Also please refrain from fully comprehensive PR's that touch 10000's of lines of code and do more than one thing. The reorganization should...