Mark van der Loo

I have seen something like this in tests of validate. It happened after `testthat` was updated, and in part inspired me to write the `tinytest` package and remove `testthat` from...

This is confusing, to me as well. Also because I cannot reproduce your problem. Here's my attempt: ``` mark@ur:~$ R --vanilla -e "library(validate);sessionInfo();validator(x > 0)" R version 4.0.4 (2021-02-15) --...

Indeed. Maybe there are some `options()` or environment variables that differ? A fresh reinstall of R&packages is worth a try. OTOH I'd like to find a way to reproduce this...

So the solution is obvious there ;-)

Thanks, there was a spelling error in one of the keys. Fixed in the online version of the cookbook.

The first error msg I see comes from filter. This is not a validate function. I'd go after that first. Maybe use dplyr::filter.and similar for the other functions? (I'm not...

Ok, so I now understand your question better. The error: ``` #> Error: Problem with `filter()` input `..1`. #> ℹ Input `..1` is `foo > 3`. #> x object 'foo'...

Hi Matthias, I think we should support something for this. One thing you can do is externalize the code lists as follows: ```r library(validate) dat

Hi there, that smells blije a bug, or an inconsistency in the documentation. Thanks for reporting!

Hi there, thanks for the support! Yes, extendability to other data types (and rule representations) is a deliberate choice in validate. It is the main reason why were needed S4...