Markus Giftthaler

Hi, we occasionally fix bugs or fill in small new features. Major Development is currently not happening. The repo is sparsely maintained, but can serve you as inspiration! > Am...

From our side, we currently unfortunately cannot support you in detail regarding this feature request. Contributions in this direction would of course always be welcome! > Am 02.08.2021 um 12:53...

Hi! Is lapack installed on your system? If not, you can install it by using `sudo apt install liblapack-dev`. Otherwise, it might be a linking issue. Are you linking your...

Is your code located in a separate repository? In that case, you need to compile your code with the flag `CT_USE_LAPACK`, too. And link against ct_optcon in target_link_libraries(... ct_optcon) in...

> My catkin package and CT are in the same workspace. That is fine, but it was not the intent of my question. Please refer to my [above comments](https://github.com/ethz-adrl/control-toolbox/issues/119#issuecomment-617751152).

the control toolbox, i.e. ct_optcon, is not a catkin package! So you cannot add it to CATKIN_DEPENDS, etc. You need to treat it like a pure cmake library. In catkin_package,...

@GuiyangXin has this been resolved now?

Dear @GuiyangXin, thank you for reporting the issue. It might well be that there are some numerical issues hidden somewhere, let us try to find them! In order to find...

@GuiyangXin, this is getting more and more interesting. The CARE implementation is in fact unit-tested against the Matlab solution, however it might well be that there unknown problems for high-dim...

The Matlab documentation says that their CARE solver requires the pair (A,B) to be stabilizable. I will need to check back on the assumptions of our CARE solver implementation, it...