Markus

> I personally think that IsBought is too strong a name for the shown implementation 🙂 Good point, yeah. I guess for the flashbang having the custom rule until #145...

I agree, but from what I understand this situation would actually be covered by the buytime check. But anyway, it's certainly safer to wait since we don't know all the...

Ahhh, bollocks! Yeah we definitely better wait then.

So with #147 being merged, do you think your fix would be possible now? If so please feel free to file a PR 🙂.

>Well #147 doesn't really solve this issue: while we are now able to tell how many flashbangs a player has, there is still no way to tell if the second...

It appears like this isn't possible for flashbangs, sorry. We can't create a new `UniqueID` because we don't actually have a separate entity for the second flashbang from what I...

You could try to use `CCSPlayerResource.m_iTotalCashSpent.NNN` where NNN is `Player.Entity.ID()` with left padding (e.g. `CCSPlayerResource.m_iTotalCashSpent.001`) But I woudln't want to integrate this into the library, seems a bit too hacky...

right, good point as well. quite unfortunate.

~~the documentation suggests this is possible, but somehow no matter what I try, I can't get security definitions into my `swagger.yaml` :thinking:~~ my problem was calling `swag init --parseDependency` instead...

I have `zellij` -> `ssh` -> `tmux` for sharing terminal sessions on a server with our dev team so I think there needs to be a general solution, not just...