Mark
Mark
I added a 3rd web app to the sample solution just for clarity and comparison with a monolithic use case.
So I added some more flavours to the sample. This time I can resolve dynamic components from other services by a "placement" contract. I think this is the best approach...
Sorry @mauroservienti just to clarify, is this "in-memory" meant for this issue's concern with UI visual composition, or related to the other issue #392 about composing in a process? Did...
FYI, I've been using a copy (and only slightly amended) version of the last "generic context" example mentioned in that thread. InMemoryRequest would have been a far better name than...
I kinda discuss the handler integration there and came to the conclusion I didn't want to couple the in-memory behaviour with the outer consumer code. Probably easier if you look...
Will an interface still be an option too do you think? In the convention case, when defining the method, does the "correct argument" imply a convention also? Just curious how...
I like it @mauroservienti . So in theory you could get as near to controller action parameter behaviour. For example, not limit a method to just a model object but...
Ah right, so the optional FromBody only applies when using ApiController attributes on controllers. Good catch.
"won't be very happy with dynamic models" - that's my understanding, also why I linked to your project item about strong types. I guess I was wondering how that would...