Alberto Mardegan

Thanks @jdstrand and @alexmurray for explaining your reasoning. While I agree with all what your write, I would still prefer if before proceeding with this we sat down and wrote...

> I still don't care for the "deny rule interface" approach because a) it would constitute a workaround for what we eventually want but is elevating the workaround to a...

> I'm a bit confused, all the UC16 systems on this branch fail to be prepared with this: [...] The issue was unrelated to this branch, and I've seen it...

The `google:ubuntu-20.04-64:tests/main/nfs-support` test failure does not seem related, at least I tried running the test 10 times in QEMU and it never failed.

Looks good to me so far. :-) Just to make sure I understood the plan: on core systems, we will have some snaps (tha base one, and maybe also others...