Marcus Müller
Marcus Müller
@nowls um, what's the state of this? I'm a bit lost on wether we already have such a `_tag_ff` implementation or not.
cc @n-west as I have no idea whether I should be doing something here or not, but you might know.
kind of like #1103 as in, needs time to check up on state and discussion with @mormj and @willcode
@mbr0wn fair enough an assessment. I'll quickly make a new issue, "make sure all these are marked deprecated" and close this one. After all, we remove blocks to limit the...
oh wait too fast this is a deprecation issue. No, let's not close it then, lets just make a PR that deprecates them. We have better infra to do deprecation...
For beginners coming this way: "deprecation" just means that for each individual block mentioned 1. add the `flags: [deprecated]` property to each block's gr-something/grc/something_blockname.block.yml, 2. Make sure the block still...
@willcode but a superset need not lead to the same underlying integer type. So, agreed, super unlikely that this is problematic, but we should probably still move the enum definition...
I'd think that for any tag with a fractional offset N.y, we need to put it on item N, as otherwise it might not get transported (e.g., when the `work`...
> I don't see that there is a chance for a work() call to get split as you say. I had this scenario in mind: Say decim==4, and ninput_items==1024; ->...
yep, these "tagging rules" is also what I've been following. And I was really confused to see that it wasn't the last item that was missing a tag (which could...