Marc Paine

For the SDK build, we have 4 container test failures and a blazor failure @lewing @baronfel `\Sdks\Microsoft.NET.Sdk\targets\Microsoft.NET.Sdk.FrameworkReferenceResolution.targets(495,5): error NETSDK1112: The runtime pack for Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.browser-wasm was not downloaded.` `System.InvalidOperationException : The...

> VMR Vertical Build Windows_x64 - windowsdesktopbuild Ahh, it has more than one error. When you click on the build, it takes you to the aspnet failure which you linked...

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=806152&view=logs&j=9050e078-31bf-5111-d8ec-8b6fa95caf9c&t=523d8a07-ca4d-5c7a-367a-d86c5fc4038b&l=3789 `\sb\package-cache\microsoft.dotnet.build.tasks.installers\10.0.0-beta.24430.1\build\wix\wix.targets(354,5): error : Exec FAILED: exit code 103 (attempt 5/5) [D:\a\_work\1\vmr\src\windowsdesktop\src\windowsdesktop\src\bundle\Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Bundle.bundleproj]`

Checking on status: - @lewing what's the fix for the browser-wasm failure if it is a migration from 9 to 10 causing it - @baronfel I assume the container tests...

That failing props line is from msbuild so transferring: https://github.com/dotnet/msbuild/blob/vs17.10/src/Tasks/Microsoft.NETFramework.CurrentVersion.props

@v-wuzhai the other PR is now in so we can fix the merge conflicts and start getting this one unblocked.

Should we remove the 9.0 templates (like we removed 8.0 from the 9.0 branch)? Should we unwind https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/pull/42743/commits/426b0434df05a5a3fbbaa550639e7f2147ba32b4? We can do those changes in a separate PR. Still not sure...

Old issue triage: Per comment above, we were not able to reproduce so closing for now. Feel free to comment if you have additional details to help us track this...

https://github.com/dotnet/arcade/issues/15654 Moving to V3 requires setting TestRunnerName to XUnitv3 first.

Looks like @Youssef1313 did the migration for aspire which is one of the only dotnet repos on V3. We should sync to understand what was the work required though looks...