Marco Walz

@nikita-fuchs can you clarify this along with your activities around devmode with @uwiger and maybe @velzevur?

cc @mmpetarpeshev @dincho @benhus

> definitely recommend testing against non-cloud node. sure that has been recommended since the beginning. nevertheless this is an issue and currently the reporting party isn't capable of setting up...

> Don't we have `devmode` for this ? what should `devmode` have to do with this?! doesn't make sense to me

true, but devmode is not a requirement to do exactly this. of course it's good to not waste resources for mining 😅

> it fails with 412 on sending from 9th to 70th, but sometimes can fail on initial funding what's your conclusion?

did that come from @thepiwo ? :) I remember him talking about that in the past

@lildude we want to provide a bounty for our community to develop this. I am currently not sure if we have 200 usages of the extension across different github repositories....

Thanks for the quick answer @lildude. It's a bit hard for me to figure that out. Not sure if we fulfill those requirements. Ideally we know that before we start...

can we get this confirmed somehow? 😬 🙌 that would be awesome @lildude