maralorn
maralorn
I think this might be a bug in the nix-derivation library. I am, however, planning to drop the dependency on that library. So it is likely this bug will go...
Taking some BSD-licensed code and republishing under GPL is not an issue, I think. But I’d rather not go down this route. Either we contribute to maintaining nix-derivation (or a...
I have pondered this for quite a while and I certainly want a good solution for this. Sadly I see a huge footgun potential here. nom takes nix from the...
Ah, well. You actually don't set nix -> nom.
Point taken. I had this on my radar anyway and will look into it.
I have witnessed this myself. Will need to figure out what is causing this.
I think this issue is fixed in 2.1.3. Feel free to reopen.
Thank you very much. This is a long-awaited improvement! I left a few comments.
Have you tested this successfully? When I test this I get the output below, where I think the noise with the "Finished at" will probably break completion? At least completion...
Yeah, a very sensible request. I vaguely remember initially trying to do this, which was impossible for some reason. I think the "copying 2321 paths" message often lacks too much...