How to accurately capture curation rules?

[matentzn]

Curation rules can be complex, but lets start with the more simple ones we can already represent:

Domain expert decision is the default:

subject_id	relation_id	object_id	match_type	object_source
HP:001	owl:equivalentTo	MP:001	sssom:HumanCuration	mp.owl

The curation rule here is: a domain expert determined or confirmed the equivalence mapping by hand.

Automated tool:

subject_id	relation_id	object_id	match_type	object_source	mapping_tool	subject_match_field	object_match_field
HP:001	owl:equivalentTo	MP:001	sssom:LexicalMatch	mp.owl	logmap	skos:exactSynonym	rdfs:label

The curation rule is: a tool (logmap) determined the equivalence mapping by matching an exact synonym of the subject to a label of the object. (this could be further refined by adding preprocessing information, such as "stemming" to these fields).

@mellybelly and others, please add more concrete curation rules you encounter regularly when creating a mapping.

[matentzn]

Just saw we already started a discussion here: https://github.com/mapping-commons/SSSOM/issues/31

[cmungall]

Seems closely related to #3.