mapache-salvaje

To be quite honest, I don't see a good reason to move forward with these changes, and this PR hasn't been touched in a couple months, so I'm going to...

Following a conversation with @mnajdova today, I think that the documentation for the stacked snackbars should live within the main Snackbar doc, following the format of the Tabs doc—see the...

I'm getting ready to do a line-by-line review, but from the jump it feels odd to me that this is the "Overview" page for the Tree View. All of the...

Can we move forward with this? I like the idea of a higher-level API for this component but in the meantime I'd love to see this implemented in the docs...

Love this! Definitely a huge upgrade. One thing to consider: we could have examples that are more complex than the ones listed here—see [this comment](https://github.com/mui/material-ui/issues/36193#issuecomment-1520163136)—for example, Material + Vite +...

Do we want to remove CRA examples entirely? See: https://github.com/mui/material-ui/pull/37595#issuecomment-1591747158. I think we should definitively answer that question before proceeding.

@BearCooder I believe what @oliviertassinari meant is that it's enough to have examples of CRA + Material UI, CRA + Base UI, and CRA + Joy UI—no need, for example,...

@BearCooder with all due respect, I think you've misunderstood what @oliviertassinari was saying. "[...] either move them to be specialized examples with Vite _or create them_". What I'm proposing is...

In the interest of moving forward here, let's do this: - keep and/or create CRA examples for Material UI, Base UI, and Joy UI in JS and TS - remove...

This looks so good @zanivan ! Wow! Huge upgrade over the earlier version. One thing I'd like to see is some padding down here underneath the Next / Previous buttons—it...