Manuel Schmidt

Results 54 comments of Manuel Schmidt

Hey @Sam-el0, thanks a lot for PR #133! I will have a look

This would affect mainly the instance module, but there both XBRL and iXBRL parsing is affected since these are separate functions.

This could also apply to context id's (see #86)

This could also apply to missing or not locatable taxonomies. #112 #76

Hey @rahulsinghal11 , sorry for the late answer.. Thank you for the proposal! According to the [XBRL Specification](https://www.xbrl.org/Specification/inlineXBRL-part1/PWD-2013-02-13/inlineXBRL-part1-PWD-2013-02-13.html#d1e5045) an ix:nonFraction element must have a value. ![image](https://github.com/manusimidt/py-xbrl/assets/29599104/b8dbd304-b228-499e-89d4-bdc9bd9ba592) That's probably the reason...

Yes, the current very deep structure of object instances is quite annoying. In the past I tried to fix this problem by creating a compile method that takes all information...

But yes, the code you provided is currently the best and only method to get the labels.

Yes, i also think that from a performance perspective this would not be a problem. If we could find a way to also "compile" the information from the relational linkbases...

This is working pretty well for now. But tomorrow I would like to test the change a little bit and add a method getLabel() to the class Concept. After that...