manuels

Wireguard solved my problems so far and I do not have time to work on DTLS currently. Maybe that might change in a year's time or so...

Oh, yes: If you need a page for testing this. It did not work for me for this page: https://sweetandweak.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/nothing-starts-the-morning-like-a-good-dose-of-panic/

ok, good to know. Thanks for ruby-oembed, btw!

What do you mean by "nat without public ip"? Do you mean no internet access or no dedicated IP?

@whirm, I'm afraid, this is not supported right now unless you run a OpenDHT bootstrapping node in your LAN.

@danielsouzat you could try a tool that wraps UDP in fake-TCP. I have seen a tool around for that but I cannot remember the name.

That depends on how you define "a lot". You'd probably have to add a TCP header which increases the package size by a few bytes and I think computation is...

Hi @tjjh89017, I am currently working on a new version (though it's just a hobby and I do not know when it's production ready, yet). I'm not sure what you...

Exactly, I could not find a design where this forwarding is not required. Though I might replace it with a eBPF program one day ;)

Not sure how this should help. I use STUN for that.