Do SANS Need an Option to Control the Output Order in PolarizationCorrectionWildes

[cailafinn]

Currently, we can define in the input order for the group workspaces into the PolarizationCorrectionWildes algorithm, but the output workspace will always be in the same order as it has been defined in the algorithm internals (++, +-, -+, --).

We should find out if this is something the scientists need/want this for SANS. It's needed for Reflectometry (see second bullet point on issue #35067), but it's whether the conversations should involve both groups.

This is a placeholder issue to determine if anything is needed on the SANS side that is not already covered by the linked issue, which was originally requested by Reflectometry.