Matej Novotny

> eclipsefdn/eca — The author(s) of the pull request is not covered by necessary legal agreements in orde... This is always going to fail for dependabot. Are we fine merging...

@starksm64 do we still need this? I don't see any such functionality in the repo but I am not sure since this has been hanging here for a while. Feel...

> I vote -1. You currently can make almost any existing method you like an observer method (provided it takes parameters) from “outside” via portable extensions. That seems useful. Thanks...

We need to take a look at whether we can lift the spec restriction of not applying decorators to producers and synth beans https://jakarta.ee/specifications/cdi/4.0/jakarta-cdi-spec-4.0.html#decorators If that doesn't work, we can...

As per discussion during last CDI mtg (Dec 5), I am closing this issue. It has been stale for three years now indicating that there isn't much interest nor are...

> And it appears to me that the spec is broken. What exactly is broken with it? I think it was deliberately designed so that both, `activate()` and `deactivate()` calls...

> there are 2 recommended ways. Recommended where? The spec doc doesn't show this, nor does the javadoc of RCC. I am not against those approaches, just stating that CDI...

> I believe that for the simple cases, it would be a lot better if we provided something like Most of these cases can likely be covered using `@ActivateRequestContext` interceptor....

> C'mon, that's not a serious answer, isn't? :) What I mean is that this is an API (and not the only one) that carries some potential risk of bad...

I've linked this to the list of future version issues as it seems nobody is keen on sacrificing their time to it now.