Matthew Nguyen
Matthew Nguyen
There are some changes to the tests here, but I think @cms-sw/heterogeneous-l2 is probably better qualified than @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 to comment
+reconstruction No changes to CPU-only workflows. Changes to GPU worksflows are said to be expected.
please test
Hi @slowmoyang can you provide a recipe to test this PR? I'm not even finding a relval wf with the number 42021.0 in 12_6_0_pre2. Why do we need to have...
I'm still trying to understand why this isn't tested in a relval workflow. Is there a plan to introduce `GEMCSCSegmentProducer` into the standard reco sequence?
> @mandrenguyen As far as I know, `GEMCSCSegment` was introduced for improving muon collection and is still being studied. So, `GEMCSCSegmentProducer` was not intentionally included in the standard reco sequence...
I would suggest to first implement a process modifier to activate this feature. See examples in: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/tree/master/Configuration/ProcessModifiers/python Once that's in place we can add a relval wf, perhaps with the...
> @mandrenguyen I added a modifier named as `gemcscSegmentsTesting` to test `GEMCSCSegmentProducer`. Also, in `gemcscsSegments_cff.py`, I replaced `Run3_GEM` modifier , which turns on GE21-ME21 segment recon, with `gemcscSegmentsTesting`. I'm not...
+reconstruction As discussed at today's reco meeting, this PR will not be backported to 12_4_X, even though it's currently being used for the online DQM. Although this PR is not...