Alexey Makridenko
Alexey Makridenko
@AlexPozh hi! are you still in?
@AlexPozh there's no need to apologise! This is all voluntary and I appreciate your help! Just wanted to know if the pull request will be continued
@AlexPozh oh, i see... when u try to get all elements of QSet -- it hitting database (test cache in this case), so there is no need to print queryset...
@AlexPozh btw, if you stuck -- push your code here so I could run it locally to help you
@AlexPozh no, actually fixture in test_q_set file
@AlexPozh could you add an issue for that please?
@AlexPozh idk, just something like "test fixtures bug", and a description what's goin on
@AlexPozh not really, we just define it like it have been already created trick is not to call _execute, cause it will hit database so when we passing args to...
@AlexPozh so, in your example everything should be fine ```python def test_greater_than_filter(self, model_mock: type['ModelMock']): # Prepare data expected_q_set = QSet( model_class=model_mock, cache=[ model_mock(id=2, name="unique_name"), model_mock(id=3, name="test_name"), model_mock(id=4, name="new_name") ], )...
@AlexPozh thank you so much!