jeff
jeff
> 🫠i tend to edit that comment so it is like a summary of the thread. that's makes much more sense. keep in mind i am a bit stressed so...
> > I do agree that the staking requirement is somewhat preventing potential honest nodes from entering the network. > > I agree as well and I proposed an upper-bound-lower-bound...
what is DNSJumper?
On Thursday, 18 May 2023 19:18:24 EDT Alex-0723 wrote: > It's a program I use so that using Lokinet in its normal mode doesn't break > the Wi-Fi connectivity. YogaDNS...
also... linux is the only platform that is reactor based i/o, literally every other one is proactor (android/apple/win32). maybe consider making linux match this or make a platform independent way...
we had a long running difficulty of making DNS on windows work in a way that it cannot leak out when exit tunneling is enabled. the `l3-intercept` option hooks every...
we were using that driver before but it has been deprecated for over a decade now. if you have the proper calls to netsh we need to call to set...
> This script doesn't look like it does anything to deal with the capabilities lokinet needs to run, so as-is I'm not sure how this is meant to work. Is...
i totally agree and this has been on my mental todo list for almost 3 years. i think we can do multiple .loki addresses on one lokinet where you have...
does nm have a dns plugin api?