jeff

additionally, socks/http proxy support for wire protocol traffic will never happen as that cannot carry UDP packets which is the requirement. we could do websockets but ... no.

does shadowsocks provide udp via socks5? i have never seen anyone ever actually implement udp forwarding via socks5.

if someone implements RFC1928 complaint UDP ASSOCIATE SOCKS5 proxy I would consider adding SOCKS5 support to lokinet. I have not ever seen anyone with this. Mostly because I have stopped...

sure, but if shadowsocks provides a compliant socks5 proxy on loopback lokinet could use that.

socks5 does theoretically allow UDP, but no one implementing SOCKS5 supports it. this is why we dont support socks5.

finally someone actually has a proper socks5 proxy.

this has a potential to break parts of the wire protocol, specifically when it comes to timeouts and such. we'll need to keep this in mind if we add socks5...

> > this has a potential to break parts of the wire protocol, specifically when it comes to timeouts and such. we'll need to keep this in mind if we...

On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 22:14:46 -0700 tedd pasta ***@***.***> wrote: > > > > this has a potential to break parts of the wire protocol, > > > >...

in the near future session will start using lokinet for onion routing and that cannot be shoved over a proxy (this is an intentional design choice of lokinet). i personally...