Magnar Sveen
Magnar Sveen
Would a third-party JSR-223 adapter work? I thought it was part of Java 8. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Abhishek Reddy [email protected] wrote: > I like the...
I see, how nice. That sounds like the best path forward, if we can't get your patch into clj-v8. Is it something you have got time for and would be...
Hi Viktor! I'm glad to hear Optimus is helping you out. :) Building optimized customer-facing websites is just why I wrote Optimus in the first place. Adding an optimus-middleware that...
That sounds brilliant! fre. 16. okt. 2015 kl. 07.34 skrev Abhishek Reddy : > > Update since this has come up again and I had some time to spare: >...
Oh, excellent. This looks great. That PR would be very welcome indeed. :)
Hi again. :) I have now ported my own JS-based middleware to the new 1.0.0-API. You can check it out here: https://github.com/magnars/optimus-autoprefixer Let me know if you have any questions!
(note that this must be used with the new Optimus, currently at `1.0.0-rc3`)
In my (admittedly limited) testing, the performance of the graaljs runtime was pretty similar to the old V8 binaries we were using before, but I haven't compared it to just...
That's a good question. You can see the story of the PR here: https://github.com/magnars/optimus/pull/52. @arbscht was the primus motor for this fix, and it seems he may have run out...
@frank-dspeed Wow, that's amazing! Since we're interop'ing with graal only via JSR223, how would one go about getting these performance improvements? An explicit dependency on graal? Upgrading java version?