Madelyn Olson

I have nothing against this, especially if it's done in a way that users can opt-in to. We do have some special code to allow for active defragmentation of Jemalloc...

> there's probably a couple other dozen things too, but that's my long-term gripe list I'm really surprised most people haven't been motivated to see the problems and fix them...

@bitnom I would prefer to have issues instead of discussions, it's easier for us to keep all of the features there then trying to review them in two places.

> wasm and wasi support would be amazing Say more? Are you interested in having Valkey be compiled into WASM or support for it in modules/scripting?

Do we want to create a compatibility layer for the lua. You can do use either `placeholderkv.call()` and `redis.call()`? It seems like we're also proposing the same thing for modules....

>My understanding is that where we are providing an implementation of an interface (and this goes for APIs, protocols, on-disk formats, etc) it is very difficult for some other party...

@hwware Can you crate two separate issues for how we might break RDB and RESP in the future though. We have a problem with the RDB version, in that we...

There will be an initial version which will be 7.2, this will purely be a compatibility release. At some point we will release a new major version, which will be...

> But some global names like pidfile and socket file would need to be more unique (as commented) and what about the binaries? It'd be silly to just call them...

I fully agree!