madoar

But ```javascript .preInstall(function() { const graphicsProperties = Bean("graphicsPropertiesFetcher").GetProperties(); print(graphicsProperties.toString()); }); ``` is working correctly?

Try recompiling again maybe the additional getter methods are not correctly added to the class...

> Could it be that I call the method on the returned object and not in the call directly ? What do you mean?

This should make no difference. There is something going really wrong with the returned object. Can you try: ```javascript const graphicsProperties = Bean("graphicsPropertiesFetcher").GetProperties(); print(graphicsProperties); print(graphicsProperties.getClass()); print(graphicsProperties.getClass().getSimpleName()); ``` and tell us...

Can you try: ```javascript print("Methods:"); graphicsProperties.getClass().getDeclaredMethods().foreach(method => { print(method.getName()); }); print("Fields:"); graphicsProperties.getClass().getDeclaredFields().foreach(field => { print(field.getName()); }); ```

Can you try `forEach` instead?

Then you should be able to access any of these methods and fields from inside JS. Have you defined `GraphicsProperties` in its own `*.java` file or is it an inner...

I agree that it is problematic that we can't declare constructor constraints in the interface. I'm fine with retaining it as it is, but I still think that a constructor...

In theory we only need to execute https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis/blob/727481fa7ee714125539b96c12002add7e50fc4f/phoenicis-scripts/src/main/java/org/phoenicis/scripts/engine/injectors/IncludeInjector.java#L36-L43 in a `try/catch` block. When catching an exception in this block we can then wrap it in a new `ScriptIncludeException` which we...

I think this issue is quite important and should be implemented for the next alpha release. I think it will also help other people who face problems with the current...