Mistral Contrastin

> No, just that there is limited reviewing capacity in the team :) Of course, no problem! > This is a mostly backwards-compatible change that should also address your use-case;...

@dorchard any ideas? Also see #111

We never considered LiquidHsakell for `fortran-src`. What sort of annotations did you have in mind? What I really like to do one day is to rewrite the AST to use...

Unlikely, it would be a lot of work and I'm not sure how much more code it would allow us to work with. In any case, have you tried using...

Why would that be an error?

Unlike gfortran, fortran-src is not a compiler, it's a frontend with emphasis on lexing, parsing, and syntactic manipulations. It does know about name resolution as it has a dataflow analyses...

Yeah, we know about this. It was mentioned in #45. Basically, this is incredibly difficult in Fortran because you can write a comment in the middle of a keyword or...

Why should the lexer fail?

The lexer is fine because name resolution is not a lexer or a parser level problem. The type checking bit is not though. There seems to be unintended shadowing. @mrd?

Just because compiler handle it doesn't necessarily mean it is valid Fortran. Though this probably is. There is a grammatical reason that I didn't resolve it earlier. I will attend...